On 2/13/19 3:56 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 February 2019 at 06:13, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I'm thinking about trying to sneak in openmpi 3.1.3 before the f30 branch.
My COPR rebuilds have been looking pretty good lately so I hope it will go
fairly smoothly. Does anyone have any objections? I'm planning on starting
tomorrow if not.
Why not 4.0.0? It was released in September 2018 and it's supposedly ABI
compatible with 3.x:
https://www.mail-archive.com/announce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg00119.html
Because it's still relatively new. I've hit enough problems with major
bumps in openmpi to be a little wary. And I don't have the COPR testing
record for it. We are doing this last minute so I'm trying to be a
little more careful.
It's a big jump from the currently packaged 2.1.6. Any idea why we are
so behind upstream? 3.0.0 was released in September 2017, 3.1.0 in May
2018. 3.0.0 should have been in F27 or F28 and 3.1.0 in F29 latest.
Because no one else has stepped up to help maintain it and I'm stretched
too thin.
Also, they say 2.1.6 is the last release in 2.1.x series, so I'd say
an update to a supported version is a must.
I concur as well.
--
Orion Poplawski
Manager of NWRA Technical Systems 720-772-5637
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane orion@xxxxxxxx
Boulder, CO 80301 https://www.nwra.com/
_______________________________________________
scitech mailing list -- scitech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to scitech-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/scitech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
