On Mon, 2012-11-19 at 08:45 -0500, Rich Mattes wrote:
> Looks like the new geos got submitted with a rebuilt player
> package[1],
> hopefully you're just seeing a mirror sync issue or something.
Hi Rich,
I thought so too. However, I've dug up some, and looks like the player
update in updates testing requires:
Error: Package: player-3.0.2-21.fc18.x86_64 (updates-testing)
Requires: libgeos-3.3.2.so()(64bit)
while the geos in updates testing provides a different soname version:
[root@ankur ~]# repoquery --provides geos
geos = 3.3.6-1.fc18
geos(x86-32) = 3.3.6-1.fc18
libgeos-3.3.6.so
libgeos_c.so.1
geos = 3.3.6-1.fc18
geos(x86-64) = 3.3.6-1.fc18
libgeos-3.3.6.so()(64bit)
libgeos_c.so.1()(64bit)
(Notice the difference in soname versioning). Somehow, the player update
seems to have been built against an older geos soname version and is why
yum barfs.
I checked up the player build log and found that it had been built
against an older geos (geos-devel-3.3.2-3.fc18.x86_64):
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/player/3.0.2/21.fc18/data/logs/x86_64/root.log
A rebuild should fix it I guess. I've given negative karma to the update
for the time being :(
--
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur: "FranciscoD"
Please only print if necessary.
Looking to contribute to Fedora? Look here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
http://dodoincfedora.wordpress.com/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ robotics mailing list robotics@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/robotics
