On 03/22/2011 05:24 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Rich Mattes<richmattes@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Sorry about that. I was waiting for feedback from you to see if you wanted >> to post the review. I've gone ahead and done so, you can find it at >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677496 >> >> I'd be happy to add you as a comaintainer once the package is accepted. > Hi Rich! > > Has the review progressed? I don't think I have the karma or > experience to be the reviewer. Anyway, I've just filed a review > request for a trivial lego-udevrules > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689961 so that nbc and > nxt_python can coexist... > > Happy to comaintain, anytime :-) > > cheers, > > > m Hi Martin, There have been a few comments on the package, but nobody has picked up the review yet. These review requests take time, especially if you're not actively soliciting for reviewers. I may have time to solicit for a review swap sometime soon, but until then I'll have to wait and see if anyone picks it up. Once lego-udevrules gets approved, I'll be happy to edit nbc to require it instead of providing its own udev rule. Rich _______________________________________________ robotics mailing list robotics@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/robotics
