On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Tim Niemueller <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > But in the given situation maintenance burden just one aspect. Packaging > something non-robotic into a "robotic udev catchall package" is a bad idea. Valid point. Maybe I gave too many examples -- I am preparing stuff for only robots at the moment, but there is some ambiguity: the same boards can be used for automation without robots. Is "Controller boards" a better umbrella name? cheers, m -- martin@xxxxxxxxxx -- Software Architect - OLPC - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff _______________________________________________ robotics mailing list robotics@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/robotics
