[Bug 471793] Description of Flash plug-in has room for improvement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471793





--- Comment #6 from Scott Robbins <scottro11@xxxxxxxxx>  2008-11-17 10:34:44 EDT ---
Ok, to further obfuscate the issue, Adobe has released a 64 bit flash player. 
This works without problem for myself and, as noted on Fedora forums, for many
others.  It's only in alpha stage at present, but is working perfectly. 

(It's a tarball that can be downloaded at 

http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10.html

When untarred, it's just a libflashplayer.so
After removing flash-plugin and nspluginwrapper,
copying it into /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins worked perfectly. 

Perhaps the release notes should reflect this possibility as well.

The main issue, in my opinion, are the newcomers.  The experienced user will
probably be familiar with the various resources that give specific instructions
to install Flash on 64 bit Fedora.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

--
Fedora-relnotes-content mailing list
Fedora-relnotes-content@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-relnotes-content

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux