Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: pilot-link configuration is incomplete https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280251 ------- Additional Comments From alexl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2008-07-09 04:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #179) > I've tested both the F9 update and the F8 scratch build - both are fine. > > You might also want to take a look at the patch in bug #454178, depending on > whether you think it best to push less updates, or less changes at once. Maybe make that a second update. > > > I assume this won't be able to pushed to stable until the > > hal-info in updates-testing is also pushed? > > That's certainly desirable, though pushing the updated pilot-link without > hal/hal-info won't do any harm, it just won't work until they land (the net > result being no different to the current update, which also doesn't work). > > Is there a way to declare this dependency in koji? Not really, I'll probably just make sure that the appropriate hal-info is already pushed before pushing pilot-link to stable, or manually withdraw it if appropriate hal-info won't be pushed simultaneously. > Otherwise, would I be right in thinking that as soon as a package gets the > requisite karma in updates-testing it'll be pushed to stable? The hal and > hal-info should get there first as they're starting with more karma. Right. > Once pushed to updates-testing I'd hope the F8 users on this bug could test > hal+hal-info+pilot-link and give the appropriate karma. That would be the plan, yes. > Bug #452701 concerns me. Will the negative karma block the hal-info push? I > can't reproduce the crash - it seems hardware specific - and the reporter hasn't > responded. Experience tells me that waiting on hal bugfixes is a bad place to > be. I suppose more widespread testing will help pin it down. Yep, it concerns me, I can definitely reproduce the hal crash, so I had to -1 karma points, also as I point out on bug #452701 comment #5 hal-info-20080607-2.fc8 doesn't appear to contain the 10-usb-pda-palm.fdi file in any case, which was the whole point of the update (at least from the point of view of pilot-link users). Perhaps we should think about reintroducing it back into the pilot-link package if the hal problems persist so we can at least get this out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora-relnotes-content mailing list Fedora-relnotes-content@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-relnotes-content
