Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: pilot-link configuration is incomplete https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280251 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-07-06 09:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #178) > Kevin please test again and I'll try to test as well, then I'll push to > updates-testing. I've tested both the F9 update and the F8 scratch build - both are fine. You might also want to take a look at the patch in bug #454178, depending on whether you think it best to push less updates, or less changes at once. > I assume this won't be able to pushed to stable until the > hal-info in updates-testing is also pushed? That's certainly desirable, though pushing the updated pilot-link without hal/hal-info won't do any harm, it just won't work until they land (the net result being no different to the current update, which also doesn't work). Is there a way to declare this dependency in koji? Otherwise, would I be right in thinking that as soon as a package gets the requisite karma in updates-testing it'll be pushed to stable? The hal and hal-info should get there first as they're starting with more karma. Once pushed to updates-testing I'd hope the F8 users on this bug could test hal+hal-info+pilot-link and give the appropriate karma. Bug #452701 concerns me. Will the negative karma block the hal-info push? I can't reproduce the crash - it seems hardware specific - and the reporter hasn't responded. Experience tells me that waiting on hal bugfixes is a bad place to be. I suppose more widespread testing will help pin it down. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora-relnotes-content mailing list Fedora-relnotes-content@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-relnotes-content
