Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: pilot-link configuration is incomplete https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280251 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-06-10 04:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #167) > I think we've waited far too long already. I say unless the new version of > hal-info-20080607-1.fc8 that appears to be in updates-testing now Ah, I hadn't seen that. The hal-info update pulls from git, so obsoletes the scratch build of pilot-link with my patch (or at least part of it). You should revert that patch. There's also a patch to fix the int_outof bug in hal, though no updated policy files (as hal didn't get bumped to the newer version, it's just an errata patch). So, if there aren't any more hal/hal-info updates, we'd need to carry the policy in pilot-link, i.e. option 2) in bug #435093 comment #4. I can cook up a new patch for pilot-link to do this, but if anyone has more effective communication with the hal packagers than bz (I'm not on IRC) it'd be nice to know they aren't going to carry the policy patches there before I waste any time on a patch. (In reply to comment #168) > Is this patch against the current F-8 or F-9 branch of pilot-link? Both. It should have applied against the CVS checkout to both F-8 and F-9. Do you prefer this kind of duplication, or a single patch to apply twice? Obviously if I make a patch for policy files I'll roll this in too. > Also, does it need to be applied to all branches (i.e. including > rawhide/devel)? Ooops, yeah, should've included rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora-relnotes-content mailing list Fedora-relnotes-content@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-relnotes-content
