On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 19:50 +0000, José Matos wrote:
> > For the rest, does it work properly for you ?
>
> OK, I am catching on all the mail after a busy week. I have not yet tried to
> apply the latest version 0.3 here are my comments from previous versions.
>
> I had to use the following patch.
>
> Some notes on the elements of the diff:
>
> * emacs refuses to address the UTF-8 encoding it only recognizes utf-8. That
> is why I have changed it for every file I had to edit.
Ok I will fix this.
> * in R2spec I have the following snippet:
> - self.version = self.file['version']
> + self.version = self.file['version'].replace("-",".")
This should be fixed already in Description.py
> * in RPackage.py I have delegated to rpm the interpretation of rpm macros
> using a pipe. The only exception to this rule is the %{name} macro that is not
> set at that time.
This looks much nicer than the dirty solution I was using :-)
> Other than those issues pointed the package works really well, it is nice to
> set back and watch it do all the work. :-)
Cool :-)
FYI, I am playing with R2rpm on cran and I have:
$ ll rpmbuild/SRPMS/R-* |wc -l
857
I think I'll be looking for space for a repo and a i686 builder :-)
Thanks again,
Pierre
_______________________________________________
r-devel mailing list
r-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
