On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 10:53 +0100, José Matos wrote: > On Friday 29 May 2009 06:53:54 Pierre-Yves wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > I would like your opinion regarding: [Bug 503108] New: R2spec-2.5.2 > > loses Version information > > > > It basically says that when the package version is 2.3-50 R2spec only > > retrieve 2.3 as being the version number. > > To me and based on the packages R-abind, R-acepack, R-mAR (and some > > other that I didn't list) this is not a bug. > > > > Do you agree with me ? > > I agree that we are loosing information in the version and that on the other > hand the dash is just a fancy replacement for the dot. > > So we could agree to replace all the dashes in R package versions by dots and > be done with it. > > Whatever we decide we should apply this uniformly to all R packages that have > this numbering. Thanks for the feedback José :) Spot, does the guideline say something about this ? Should they ? Should we bring the discussion to a broader audience ? Regards, Pierre _______________________________________________ Fedora-r-devel-list mailing list Fedora-r-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-r-devel-list
