On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 13:23 +0200, pingou wrote: > Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 02:56 -0700, Alex Lancaster wrote: > > > >> I agree, wait for F-9. Then we can put it through updates-testing, > >> have time to push dependent packages that might need rebuilding, > >> including (but probably not limited to) rpy. > >> > >> Meanwhile we could push versions for F-7 & F-8 to updates-testing to > >> shake out potential problems. Then push them all to stable after F-9 > >> is released. > > > > Ehhh, i don't want to break the upgrade path. We'll just sit on this > > until after F-9. > > > > What about pushing it now ? :) > > I have started to look at the new bioconductor release, some of them > will require R >= 2.7.0. It is now in testing for all active releases (F-7, F-8, F-9): https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F7/pending/rpy-0.4.6-25.fc7,R-2.7.0-2.fc7.1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/pending/rpy-1.0.1-4.fc8,R-2.7.0-2.fc8.1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/pending/rpy-1.0.1-6.fc9,R-2.7.0-2.fc9.1 I'm not sure why these haven't pushed yet, I did them several days ago. ~spot _______________________________________________ Fedora-r-devel-list mailing list Fedora-r-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-r-devel-list
