>>>>> "JM" == José Matos writes: JM> On Tuesday 22 April 2008 18:37:40 Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: >> I was going to look through the changelog and try to determine >> whether it merited a last minute tag for F-9 or not. Opinions >> welcome. JM> AFAIK there is nothing so serious that can't wait for F-9 JM> release. Also all modules need to be recompiled, this can be done JM> best after F-9. I agree, wait for F-9. Then we can put it through updates-testing, have time to push dependent packages that might need rebuilding, including (but probably not limited to) rpy. Meanwhile we could push versions for F-7 & F-8 to updates-testing to shake out potential problems. Then push them all to stable after F-9 is released. Alex _______________________________________________ Fedora-r-devel-list mailing list Fedora-r-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-r-devel-list