On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 9:01 AM François Kooman <fkooman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 1/17/20 1:17 PM, Remi Collet wrote: > > As difficult as running a small set of commands ? > > > > # dnf module reset php > > # dnf module enable php:7.3 > > # dnf distro-sync > > > > The same than for switching from one official stream to a new one > > Hi Remi! > > Yeah, that's nice for experimentation. For our production servers > running CentOS and RHEL that is not really acceptable. > > It seems there's nothing we can do but wait until php-(lib)sodium > becomes available either directly through the official module(s) or > EPEL. Fortunately we have some years until CentOS 7 / RHEL 7 is EOL, > maybe by then this module/EPEL situation is resolved :) > If you need this fixed officially, you'll probably want to file a support case with Red Hat, assuming you have a RHEL subscription. :) Filing a bug in RHBZ against RHEL 8 would probably be helpful for the rest of us to track, too. :) -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ php-devel mailing list -- php-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to php-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/php-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
