Le 15/07/2009 16:31, Christopher Stone a écrit : > I've seen a couple php-pear packages come through the review pipes > recently with underscores in their names like > php-pear-HTML_Javascript[1] and php-pear-Auth_HTTP[2]. Shouldn't these > have dashes instead of underscores in their names? Yes, I think you're right. >From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines "When naming packages for Fedora, the maintainer must use the dash '-' as the delimiter for name parts. The maintainer must NOT use an underscore '_', a plus '+', or a period '.' as a delimiter. " But : "packages where the upstream name naturally contains an underscore are excluded from this." > I thought the > naming guidelines suggested not using underscores? Have the rules > changed? Guidelines seems not clear enough. I've add a explicit comment in pending proposal change to Guidelines https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/PHP Definitively "pear make-rpm-spec" should be the reference ;) Don't know how we should handle this 2 packages... Open a bug ? > > Regards, > Chris > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508075 > [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508082 > > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-php-devel-list mailing list > Fedora-php-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-php-devel-list > _______________________________________________ Fedora-php-devel-list mailing list Fedora-php-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-php-devel-list
