-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Tim Jackson a écrit : > I've been meaning to say it for a while, but if anyone wants to try the > latest (CVS) version of PEAR_Command_Packaging, I did add support for both: Well, I'm working on this. Make first SRPM available : http://rpms.famillecollet.com/SRPMS/php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging-0.1.3-0.cvs20090127.fc10.remi.src.rpm What I've done : - - update the fedora specific patch (don't know if all is needed) - - update the fedora template.spec - - add the fedora template-channel.spec In both, I change the name of the .xml to %{name} (we could encounter conflict if we only use %{pear_name}). %{name} seems a robust solution. I cannot change the default for doc_files_relocation_script and doc_files_statement... Channel generated spec seems ok. There is an issue in the generated extension spec in the uninstall command. In template : @possible_channel@%{pear_name} Generated : components.ez.no%{pear_name} We need a / between channel and extension name. All seems ok with the PHP Guideline draft Update https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/PHP Remi, Regards. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Remi - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkl/PjAACgkQYUppBSnxahijIQCg09DGHFdF5DCYsnxzRt5yjV5w 2O4AoL6uN+Kh22Leh1tvZKNf1kU+V2XO =S781 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Fedora-php-devel-list mailing list Fedora-php-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-php-devel-list
