Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: The latest F14 ocaml-lablgtk has lower NVR than F13 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626765 Summary: The latest F14 ocaml-lablgtk has lower NVR than F13 Product: Fedora Version: 14 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ocaml-lablgtk AssignedTo: gemi@xxxxxxxxxx ReportedBy: atkac@xxxxxxxxxx QAContact: extras-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx CC: dwheeler@xxxxxxxxxxxx, gemi@xxxxxxxxxx, rjones@xxxxxxxxxx, amdunn@xxxxxxxxx, fedora-ocaml-list@xxxxxxxxxx Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: The latest F14 ocaml-lablgtk has lower NVR than F13 because the latest F14 build failed (https://kojiweb.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=187388). Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): $ koji latest-pkg dist-f13-updates ocaml-lablgtk Build Tag Built by ---------------------------------------- -------------------- ---------------- ocaml-lablgtk-2.14.0-5.fc13 dist-f13-updates dwheeler $ koji latest-pkg dist-f14-updates-candidate ocaml-lablgtk Build Tag Built by ---------------------------------------- -------------------- ---------------- ocaml-lablgtk-2.14.0-4.fc13 dist-f14 rjones Actual results: F13 package is newer than F14 one Expected results: F14 NVR >= F13 NVR Additional info: Main problem is that ocaml-lablgtk redefines glib's g_value_{get,set}_variant symbols. I'm not sure if simple removal of those symbols from ocaml-lablgtk sources doesn't cause regression. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ ocaml-devel mailing list ocaml-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ocaml-devel
