On Mon August 25 2008, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Now the downside to doing this is that it would require any OCaml > users of EPEL 5 to recompile their software. This may just be a > simple recompile, but there are also worst-case scenarios such as > people using and relying on the old camlp4 who may have to make > modifications of their software. So it's quite a big disruption for > everyone. I'm also very aware that EPEL is supposed to be long-term > stable. > > Comments? How about doing the update when EPEL is based on RHEL 5.3. Then there could be also an announcement that EPEL updated it and at this time RHEL/CentOS users will expect bigger updates that normally. Regards, Till
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Fedora-ocaml-list mailing list Fedora-ocaml-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ocaml-list
