On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 01:07:35PM -0400, Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote: > I'm a bit confused about the ocaml-lablgtk package. First, this appears > to be lablgtk2 rather than lablgtk, which leads me to wonder whether the > package is correctly named. When I originally repackaged lablgtk2 I named the package ocaml-lablgtk2, but there was consensus [where? - IRC?] to leave the name as ocaml-labgtk. Unless you want to install both labgtk1 & lablgtk2 this shouldn't be a problem, although it is slightly inconsistent with Debian. > Second, this appears to be version 2.6, while the current upstream > is 2.10.1. This leads me to wonder (given that I know you just spun > this) whether there may be a good reason to stick with the earlier > revision for now? Yes, because both binary and source break when you upgrade. Binary breakage requires us to rebuild all dependent packages, which is time-consuming. Source breakage is usually more complicated. We have version 2.10.1 in Rawhide, and 2.10.0 in Fedora 9 however, so perhaps using a later version of Fedora is an option? You can also try using packages from Fedora 9 and/or Rawhide in Fedora 8 -- just fiddle with /etc/yum.repos.d/* to enable the later repository. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any software inside the virtual machine. Supports Linux and Windows. http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/ _______________________________________________ Fedora-ocaml-list mailing list Fedora-ocaml-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ocaml-list
