On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 18:14 +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/OCaml > > Diff from the previous version: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/OCaml?action=diff&rev2=2&rev1=1 It doesn't address multilib. For example, the -devel packages should require ocaml of the _same_ architecture, not just "ocaml". In particular, the example that "ocaml-pcre-devel needs an explicit 'Requires: pcre-devel'" is wrong, because an i386 pcre-devel package would satisfy that, while not being particularly useful for an x86_64 ocaml-pcre-devel. Because of bug #235755 you may need to use virtual provides or file-based dependencies to express the dependencies correctly. Unless we put 235755 on the F9Blocker... :) -- dwmw2
