On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 05:06:32PM -0500, Mel Chua wrote: > I tried drafting out an ascii version of the workflow I saw being tossed > around at FUDCon - thoughts? Is this accurate? Workable? It's pretty simple. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Insight#Content_workflow > > (I'm not sure if I'm using the word "workflow" in the same way that FWN > uses it - if there's another word I should use instead, or some way this > diagram ought to be revised, please ping - or edit the wiki version. ;) As a workflow it makes sense, in the answering if you are using the correct term etc. One thing that is missing is a box alongside "press" "web" "fedora planet" that is an in-flow for original content targeted for FI. Might want to add that even if you don't intend original content for a while? To confirm you have the right idea, this is what a "normal" high-level CMS workflow might look like: +--------+ | Writer |------+ +--------+ | | | Sent back for rewrite | | +--------+ | | Editor |-----<NO> +--------+ | <YES> | +----------------------+ +-------------------------+ | Published or queued |-----<CANCEL>----| May cancel some content | | by publishing editor | | as inappropriate or no | +----------------------+ | longer relevant. | +-------------------------+ - Karsten -- name: Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Community Gardener team: Red Hat Community Architecture uri: http://quaid.fedorapeople.org gpg: AD0E0C41
Attachment:
pgpfsyyr6p0TZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Fedora-news-list mailing list Fedora-news-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-news-list
