On 28/09/09 03:26 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 15:05 -0400, Pascal Calarco wrote:
Great, thanks for the feedback, Rahul! This is indeed useful feedback.
I don't think announcements to devel-announce list should be mingled
with general announcement. The initial summary should cover only major
announcements and devel-announce mails should be in a separate
development beat.
Pascal, could you avoid top-posting? It leads to confusing quoting
situations like the above :)
I agree with Rahul, however we're still suffering from the lack of
anyone to write a development beat, I believe, which makes it less
practical. I was going to volunteer for this a while back, but realized
I just don't have the time :(
Yes, the development beat is really key, and we need to find someone for
this. I wonder if we could kick this up to FESCo to see if they could
identify/persuade someone to revive?
As a side note, I also spoke to David Nalley when I was at Ohio Linux
Fest this past weekend about reviving the security advisories beat
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FWN/Beats/SecurityAdvisories). David
just doesn't have time right now to do this, and is going to try to find
someone.
David, I thought about this over the weekend, and I think this is a beat
I could pick up, if need be. Seems like just a matter of subscribing to
the fedora-package-announce mailing list and aggregating the items
marked security for the beat for the various releases?
- pascal
_______________________________________________
Fedora-news-list mailing list
Fedora-news-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-news-list
