Re: Can I correct something in 166, or should I wait?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 13:37:38 -0800, "Larry Cafiero"
<larry.cafiero@xxxxxxxxx> said:
> Hey, all --
> 
> I didn't get something quite right in the RIT story in the Ambassadors
> report. Is this something I can fix in this edition or should I just
> correct
> it in the next one?

In general we've just added an "Erratum" to the next issue. Just add it
at the head of your beat. While FWN#166 has not actually gone out as a
mailshot yet[*] I'd rather not add anything in once we're past the
deadline described in workflow.

* I posted it bright and early this Monday morning but for the nth time
I am unable to post without moderation to @fedora-announce.  I've opened
tickets on this in the past and have no idea what else I'm supposed to
do: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/861



-- 
  Oisin Feeley
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OisinFeeley

_______________________________________________
Fedora-news-list mailing list
Fedora-news-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-news-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Wildlife]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux