On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 21:37:05 +0100, "Thorsten Leemhuis" > Maybe give it a small test in one of the next issues and ask readers > what they prefer? Makes sense. I'll try it out for the next issue at least. > I for one read most of the important fedora lists. But not all -- I for > example stopped reading ambassadors and marketing some years ago and > would like to rely on FWN to highlight important discussions in a short > manner (if there are any); if I then find the topic interesting I'll > jump to the list to read the details To be honest I have no idea what our reader profiles really are, but given that you're one of the few people to give feedback I'm going to go with a trial run of what you suggest and then see if we get masses of complaints. I suspect that you may be more in tune with what is going on than many of our readers however and there may be a tension between serving your needs and those on the other end of the spectrum: people that don't read much in the way of the mailing lists at all, let alone Bugzilla. [snip] > > I would prefer all the links at the bottom of each item. > > For text only: Sure. But in HTML/wiki I'd prefer to not see them at all. OK, we can do that I think. Just a numbered reference which is an anchor to the actual link should be something we can do. But for the plaintext mailing we'll append the links below each item instead of below each paragraph. > > > [...] > >> The OpenSUSE weekly news > >> http://en.opensuse.org/OpenSUSE_Weekly_News/49 > >> look much more professional, > > For what value of "professional"? [...] > > (a) looks way better > (b) you get more information without scrolling > (c) it's not that lengthy, which imho is a big plus in todays world, as > there are so many information you get offered in different places, hence > if I get to many details I'll move on elsewhere Points taken on board. > > >> are likely a whole less work and they even > >> get them translated because they are shorter/focus on the more important > >> things. > > "More important" than what? My impression is that you'd prefer it if > > there were no "Developments" or "Virtualization" sections and simply a > > list of what gets posted to @fedora-announce and some entries from > > Planet. > > *I* for one would like to see the ten or twelve (?) most important > things *for the overall project* mentioned briefly and (in addition) > quick one-line links to other things that are also important, but do not > qualify as "most important". Hmmm. It's going to be a difficult judgement call to be able to discern what is important "for the overall project". I don't think I'd want to try to do that. Nearly everything on Developments has implications for the overall project. I see the Developments beat as more or less following where the interest and action is, mainly by the volume of posting on a topic. If you, or anyone else, can spot things which should definitely be covered for an upcoming issue then I'd appreciate a friendly ping to make sure I'm on the job. I've tried to do things like cover FESCo deliberations a little so that the context of some of the discussions makes sense to readers who *don't* follow all the important threads, let alone IRC channels. I've realized several weeks that important topics have been neglected, but that's only in retrospect. > > The Art team for example does great work, but most of the stuff in > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FWN/LatestIssue#Artwork afaics is only of > interest for members of the Art team. Hence it should not be in the FWN; > instead it could go to their list if they want to sum up things. I really don't think I agree with that. I like reading about what goes on in the Art team as I'm not subscribed to their lists (nor am I going to subscribe), so it's valuable to me to get a quick overview of what they do. Similarly with Virtualization there is no way that I could digest the vast amount of change that's happening and I don't want to be on another list, so getting a weekly digest is absolutely invaluable to me. [snip] > Well, yes, I don't like it very much -- mainly because it for me > contains simply to many information to read each week. But I like the > general idea of FWN and that's why I shared my point of view. I didn#t > want to discourage or disappoint you. As I said before, I really do appreciate the feedback. As Max mentioned in another email your opinion carries a good deal of weight in the project! Apart from that you would be surprised how little feedback we get from anyone. I'm thinking about what you've said and will certainly take a shot at making the Development beat more concise. Apart from anything else it's a mammoth effort to put it out each week. Thanks for sharing your perspective on FWN and I hope that the upcoming issues will be a little more to your taste! Best wishes, -- Oisin Feeley http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OisinFeeley _______________________________________________ Fedora-news-list mailing list Fedora-news-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-news-list
