On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 18:59:24 +0530, "Rahul Sundaram" <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said: > Jeffrey Tadlock wrote: > > > I would agree with removing the speculation and guesses, including > > removing the Debian thing. The DSA vs. RSA bit has some relevance as > > Fedora Contributors are needing to re-upload their SSH keys to FAS and > > DSA keys are no longer accepted to my knowledge. > > Yes, however this happened sometime *before* the incident. Great prompt feedback from everyone. Please feel free to snip out anything deemed non-useful. I'm afraid I'm out of the loop for a few hours, so have at it. I kind of agree with the comments arguing that the current presentation may be muddying the waters a bit. My thinking (while knowing nothing) was to try to get a rough historical context of both how this incident progressed *publically* and also how other projects have been compromised in the past. Perhaps not appropriate. So please, slash away as desired. Thanks to all for the rapid, smart responses -- Oisin Feeley http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OisinFeeley _______________________________________________ Fedora-news-list mailing list Fedora-news-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-news-list
