Re: Special issue #140

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 9:00 AM, Chris Tyler <chris@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 15:53 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote:
>> Chris Tyler wrote:
>> > (Who still hasn't received the Aug 22 mail from Paul, ???!)
>>
>> Those who are not subscribed to the Fedora lists.
>>
>> To me, this is more transparency, which is a good thing.
>
> Ok, that sounds reasonable, but why repost the speculation and guesses?
> Why mention the Debian thing, and switching from DSA to RSA (neither of
> which apply here)? That just muddies the situation and will leave people
> with the wrong impressions.
>
> -Chris
>


I agree with Chris I 'perused' the current copy and the first words
that alarmed me were 'modification of a kernel'. Despite the fact that
it's a note, which should at best be a link the casual reader will
assume someone modified a Fedora kernel, pushed it out, and that will
cause hysterics. I see no need to mention Debian's problems.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-news-list mailing list
Fedora-news-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-news-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Wildlife]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux