Re: Following up with beat writers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 08:08:52 -0400, "Josh Bressers"
<bressers@xxxxxxxxxx> said:
> > > 
> > > 1) as soon as an issue is released, an editor-type changes the date to 
> > > the next deadline day, and marks every beat as "INCOMPLETE".
> > > 
> > > 2) Beats that don't have a writer are marked as "NO WRITER".
> > > 
> > > 3) Beats that have a writer but aren't happening that week, for whatever 
> > > reason, are marked as "NOT HAPPENING".
> > > 
> > > 4) Beats that are in progress are marked "IN PROGRESS".
> > > 
> > > 5) Beats that are finished are marked "COMPLETE" along with a note to 
> > > list.
> > 
> 
> Do you expect the beat writers to do this?

Yes please.  Unless it seems like too much extra burden.  Obviously
editors would take care of #2 "NO WRITER" but all the other information
is more easily available to the actual beat writer. So instead of the
editorial team sending out queries to see what is happening the beat
writer can just jump straight to a central place to update us on the
status.

-- 
  Oisin Feeley
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OisinFeeley

_______________________________________________
Fedora-news-list mailing list
Fedora-news-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-news-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Wildlife]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux