Re: Editing chores to be broken up and some questions.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Oisin and Huzaifas --

I also completed the Marketing beat for this week and marked it as such, since we're still looking for someone to do that.

Huzaifas has permissions to push out the final copy to the list, so I am happy to have him do that piece.

AFAIK, the beat writer is responsible to edit the wiki to indicate completion of a week's beat; that is how I have been handling it.

As far as the styleguide, I think folks will be okay with editing this; as long as the meaning isn't changed, enhancing how the content comes across is a good thing, IMO.

I am going to be traveling most of tomorrow, but will be in touch with e-mail Sunday early evening again. This week I have more time to work on the other pieces of the workflow. The item that I think we need to do next is follow up with identified beat writers who haven't been/able to contributing in recent weeks. In parallel, we can perhaps ask on the ambassador list for people who are able to contribute to the open beat spots.

  - pascal

Oisin Feeley wrote:
Hi Pascal, Huzaifas,

I've submitted my beat and edited Max's and Nicu's and marked all three
as completed in the Beats Sections table[1].  I was going to write a
brief summary overview drawing attention to highlights of this issue but
I'll wait until the rest of the beats are in.

Looking at the workflow[2] page we need to sort out among ourselves
exactly who has responsibility for what and to then update this page as
our common reference/reminder.

As I mentioned before I'm happy to make an editorial pass over two other
beats besides my own.  Do I, or the beat writer, update the Beats
Sections table[1] to indicate completion?  I guess it's the beat writer
to show us that they've signed-off and are done with the content.

With regard to turning the wikipage into an email which gets blasted out
to e.g. LWN, what do we have to do and which of us will do it?

Finally, how concerned are we with editing for e.g. Active vs. Passive
voice as mentioned in the StyleGuide and discussed previously? Personally I'd prefer to follow the StyleGuide and made some minor
changes to the beats I edited in order to follow it. How do our
contributors feel about having their text mangled to follow these
rules/suggestions?

1. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FWN/Beats

2. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FWN/WorkFlow

_______________________________________________
Fedora-news-list mailing list
Fedora-news-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-news-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Wildlife]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux