On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 14:51 +0200, Eli Wapniarski wrote: > At the end of the debate, I would like to get a public consensus and > commtiment against a standard method for package management. What is > important about this is basic security and stability of Fedora based systems > which includes Redhat Enterprise and Centos releases. > > By getting feedback from real world users and developers in an open debate > perhaps shortcommings and strengths of all three systems would be discussed > based on real world working experience as opposed to theoretical self > congratulations that developers are prone to getting used to the product that > they've developed. In that case, it is worth doing your homework, if you haven't. Much of your original email contained arguments that I think have been addressed on fedora-devel-list. Some reasoned Google searches (yum versus apt-get site:redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list) should turn up list threads. -- Karsten Wade, Developer Community Mgr. Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org gpg key : AD0E0C41
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Fedora-news-list mailing list Fedora-news-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-news-list
