Hi all, I'm trying to write up the "remove root login via display-manager" thread for the Devel news beat and I'm completely stumped as to what Alan Cox is saying in this comment: "And my violent objection would be to forcing the creation of a local user account IFF the user has not selected any remote authentication scheme. If I've not ticked any of ldap, nis, .. etc then its a very good idea to be extremely clear to the user that they want a non root account." https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-September/msg01553.html I'll admit to being tired, but to me the propositional logic of the first sentence isn't borne out by the second. The first sentence implies either: 1) force creation of local user, no remote authentication selected 2) don't force creation of local user, remote authentication selected and his objection to these is contradicted by his second sentence which agrees with 1). Any thoughts? -- Oisin Feeley oisinfeeley@xxxxxxxxxxxx -- http://www.fastmail.fm - The way an email service should be _______________________________________________ Fedora-news-list mailing list Fedora-news-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-news-list
