On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 19:21 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Nevertheless could you guys sooner or later discuss the "Or are we > allowed to fix errors (like the two things mentioned above) ourself if > we find them?" question? tia! How would you envision fixing them? You could: * Respond on your own blog * Reply to f-announce-l with an errata * Reply to the list where the erroneous report came from, making it clear what the error is; then the reporter picks up the correction for next week It doesn't make sense to edit the Wiki; the content there is essentially gone once it is written into the newsletter. I think for something that is an obvious factual error on FWN's part, we should issue an errata, to f-announce-l; that at least is what I propose. That makes the errata "official". But if the situation were different, such as you disagreeing with an opinion or interpretation, then your only recourse is channels you have direct access to -- your own blog, email lists, etc. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41 ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
