On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 15:36 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 21:35:59 +0200 > Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Is this an official decission? Rahul thought it is mandatory[1] and > > Toshio was not sure. > > > If it is, I feel that fedora-devel-announce should be > mandatory/automatic, but fedora-devel itself would be optional (but > encouraged). Right. We weren't planning on having the high volume list (fedora-devel) be mandatory. /B -- Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BrianPepple gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
