> Toshio Kuratomi wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Jon Ciesla wrote: >>> With release 0.8.2, upstream has merged the program and data tarballs. >>> I'm thinking of merging netpanzer-data into netpanzer and obsoleting >>> netpanzer-data. Any objections? >>> >> Isn't the netpanzer data large and not subject to as much change as the >> engine? If so, there are still reasons to keep the data separate from >> the game engine. >> > > If upstream distributes things in one tarbal, they should be in one SRPM, > and > then splitting is no use. This rationale is also why xmoto-edit was split from xmoto when upstream split them. > Also AFAIK netpanzer doesn't get frequent package updates. My thoughts as well. I'll get to work, and keep watching this space for further discussion. Thanks! > Regards, > > Hans > > -- > Fedora-maintainers mailing list > Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers > -- novus ordo absurdum -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
