Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
"JLT" == Jason L Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
JLT> but also the license (the "VOSTROM Public License") is strange
JLT> and had never been officially checked for acceptability in
JLT> Fedora.
In case anyone wants to see the license, it't actually not on the
upstream website but I've extracted it from the tarball:
http://www.math.uh.edu/~tibbs/vostrom-license.txt
What do you think is strange about this license? Looks permissive to me.
Rahul
--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
