Re: RFC: licensing issue with lft

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
"JLT" == Jason L Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

JLT> but also the license (the "VOSTROM Public License") is strange
JLT> and had never been officially checked for acceptability in
JLT> Fedora.

In case anyone wants to see the license, it't actually not on the
upstream website but I've extracted it from the tarball:
http://www.math.uh.edu/~tibbs/vostrom-license.txt

What do you think is strange about this license? Looks permissive to me.

Rahul

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux