On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 22:20:31 -0600 "Jerry James" <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I'd like to get findbugs into Fedora. Findbugs can optionally use ASM > instead of BCEL. I would like to get ASM into Fedora first, then, so > we don't have any pesky options that don't work. Jpackage.org has an > ASM package already; two of them in fact. The package named "asm" > contains version 1.5.3, and the package named "asm2" contains version > 2.1. However, the current ASM release is version 3.0 (as of November > 2006). Should I follow jpackage.org and go with an "asm2" package > until they release a version 3, or should I cut to the chase and > create a version 3 package for Fedora? In the latter case, I presume > it should be named "asm3" and have a version number containing "jpp"; > is there any reason to do otherwise? Thanks, asm2 is already in Fedora. It's just never been built. It's owner is Permaine Cheung (pcheung). josh -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
