On Friday 17 August 2007, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > Please, go back to common sense with this one and do what the vast > majority of authors intended by putting a GPLv2 COPYING file in their > source tarball, not what we know is the most liberal licensing that we > can legally distribute their code under. -1 Again, the COPYING they put there explicitly says "If the Program does not specify a version number of this License, you may choose any version ever published by the Free Software Foundation." Guessing that they actually meant v2 or something else when the files they actually put in the distribution themselves _explicitly say otherwise_, and labeling them according to our guess without asking for clarification would be pretty damn arrogant, and plain wrong. -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
