On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 11:20 -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: > Oliver Falk wrote: > >> *Anything* is better than having glibc calling abort()... imho... > > > > Wouldn't most programs - I can think of some big commercial DB - then > > abort as well? > Letting commercial DB abort is much different than having glibc abort > They are making the decision on what to do, not glibc. Leaving those > types of decisions in the handles of the apps is much better than > having glibc playing God.. imho... +1 not that I am a big fan of proprietary software (not at all), but aborting a DB (or any other software that manages complex structures) with the risk of corrupting the DB is definitely WRONG. Simo. -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
