On 08/16/2007 05:16 PM, Steve Dickson wrote: > Oliver Falk wrote: >> Most developers I know, don't worry about >warnings<, but do if their >> code aborts. If a developer then doesn't worry about the real (security) >> problem, but only about the abort itself and just workaround that - it's >> simply a fault... The other option? stderr "FIX YOUR OPEN :-P"; sleep >> 600. :-) >> >> If you compile the whole Fedora tree, how many warnings will you see? >> How many warnings are about 'better use mkstemp' - for security >> reasons... If you don't abort you'll not catch the developers >> attention... It's too bad, but true... Don't want to step on dev's toes >> of course - it's for sure not true for *all* developers! > I was talking about runtime warnings... Really nasty looking messages > so they couldn't be ignored... Oh well: [of@pils ~]# banner nasty warning # # # ##### ####### # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ##### # # # # # ####### # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # ##### # # # # # ###### # # ### # # ##### # # # # # # # ## # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ###### # # # # # # # # #### # # # ####### # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # ## # # ## ## # # # # # # ### # # ##### Yes, Steve I know what you meant - but I'm not sure if it will help - especially GUI apps, where you wouldn't see the stderr... Many apps on my desktop JustWork(tm), but in background they spot some ugly messages... -of -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
