On 08/07/2007 02:04 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > Once upon a time Tuesday 07 August 2007, Oliver Falk wrote: >> Hi David! >> >> On 08/07/2007 09:26 AM, David Woodhouse wrote: >>> I think that's perhaps a little harsh in some cases. Take the blocker >>> in Ralf's case, for example -- ocaml. I wouldn't necessarily expect a >>> package maintainer to be willing and able to port its code generation >>> back end to any new architecture which we happen to add to Fedora; >>> that really is the job of the 'arch team'. >> [ ... ] >> >> I also see problems compiling ocaml on Alpha - maybe you can tell me >> your progress on that? > I have ocmal built on sparc. I will do some run time tests and see if it > actually works. im thinking it will since ppc works. It is not built > sparc64 yet. Well, after some testing now... ocaml builds fine on Alpha. BUT with the old non-relaxed binutils... The new binutils with relax enabled by default doesn't work. I was also not able to use --no-relax... However. Best, Oliver -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
