On 03/08/07, Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 08:41:54AM -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote: > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg36584.html > > > > > > These arguments would seem to apply equally well to > > > inclusion/exclusion of liberation fonts in Fedora as well. Thoughts? > > > > Talking to the FSF, to see what they think. > > And mozilla, and firefox and the fedora naming, and ... > > this is trademark and very different from copyright. > > I'm suprised the Debian people don't take a bigger exception to the > "shall be governed by the laws of the USSA..." UIt's not specifically the content of the trademark requirements that cause the problem as I understand it, but rather that taking the GPLv2 license and adding restrictions may be creating a license which is impossible to comply with. -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
