On 8/2/07, Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > If you're clarifying the license tag in your spec but the software > itself isn't changing licenses, I don't think that's necessary. I would concur. It's vitally important to do our best to communicate to the other maintainers if the licensing is actually changing. Communicating licensing changes as widely as possible is "shout it from the rooftops" important. The re-tagging of existing packages for clarification is an orthogonal development which will help us moving forward with internal efforts to identify and address licensing issues. Important...but not "shout it from the rooftops" important. -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
