I am the maintainer of octave-forge, a set of add-on packages for
octave. The structure of the source package has been changed to separate
it into a number of sub-packages. I think it would be a good idea to
follow this structure in the Fedora package, particularly since some
sub-packages have external dependencies that not all users may really
need. The octave-forge package would become a meta-package that just
installs all of the sub-packages. The question here is, should each of
the new sub-packages be subject to its own review? It's a total of
almost 40 packages, considerably more than I currently maintain, and I'm
worried that this will significantly increase the time commitment, which
I'm not sure I can do. Is there anyone out there who has a particular
interest in any of the octave-forge sub-packages who may be interested
in maintaining it?
Quentin
--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
