On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:46:09 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 03:42:09PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:24:12 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 08:06:27AM -0400, buildsys fedoraproject org wrote: > > > > berrange AT redhat.com: > > > > python-virtinst > > > > F7-updates-testing > F8 (0:0.200.0-2.fc7 > 0:0.200.0-1.fc8) > > > > > > This report is bogus. I built the F7 and F8 versions within minutes > > > of each other yesterday mid-afternoon. The F8 version is 0:0.200.0-2.fc8 > > > > Your package is not in the rawhide repodata, and it is not tagged f8-test1 > > either. That's all that counts. > > Given that this situation will resolve itself as soon as the test1 freeze > is release, IMHO, the script should not complain. > > Dan. The only sane work-around *during the freeze* would be to exclude F7 updates-testing. Everything else remains a broken upgrade path for the F8 Test 1 testers. -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
