Bill Nottingham (notting@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > Bill Nottingham (notting@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > Hans de Goede (j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx) said: > > > For those who want to know, gkrellm has moved to GPL v3, coming from GPL v2 > > > > Are *ANY* of the plugins that use it, even the ones we do not ship, licensed > > under only GPL2? If so, we really can't push this on earlier releases. > > ... and so it begins ... > > gkrellmms brings in xmms. As long as it's not pulling in any xmms *plugins*, > this is probably OK. If it is, I don't even want to think about it, because > that way lies madness. > > gkrellem-gkfreq does not specify 'or any later version', so is now no longer > distributable. > > gkrellmoon does not specify 'or any later version', so is now no longer > distributable. > > gkrellsun does not specify 'or any later version', so is now no longer > distributable. > > gkrellweather does not specify 'or any later version', so is now no longer > distributable > > At least both the sun and the moon are similarly encumbered. > > So, four separate gkrellm plugins are now no longer distributable until > a) they change licenses > b) we remove the new gkrellm Upon further reading... these four don't specify any version of the license at all. So they're technically OK, by accident. Gotta love licenses. Bill -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly