Re: foo vs. foo+

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 03:41:37PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Jul 2007, Axel Thimm wrote:
> >No, that's a different bug probably. If one of the virtual provides
> >was a real entity then you trigger another rpm bug that was tagged a
> >feature (check bugzilla for concurrent python of some sound libs from
> >ccrma for details, I don't have the bz# handy): It automatically
> >introduces silent Obsoletes ...
> 
> FWIW, that particular "feature" is gone in rpm 4.4.2.1.

Now that's what I call good news! :)

Wonder if this mis-feature removal could ever make it into RHEL. After
all it did break many sane assumptions of a couple ISVs already ...
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgptH8meGV6Do.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux