On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 10:46:55AM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Wednesday 27 June 2007 10:34:56 Axel Thimm wrote: > > Wasn't this going to change? Or was in discussion at least? There was > > some concern about buildroot poisoning, but that rarely happens > > (although it has happened to me once with nx ...), and if it happens > > it isn't really detected anyway until it gets higher visibility. > > > > The problem is that some packages need to be built and pushed > > together, even for updates-testing. > > Rel-Eng would like to experiment with letting potential updates populate the > buildroot, but we require bodhi not allow updates to be pushed out if they > were built against something that is also not already pushed out or being > pushed out. That would be great, thanks! Probably something to watch fedora-devel-announce for news :) -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpfhgV4SI9tx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
