On 6/20/07, Kelly <lightsolphoenix@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It's fine now; what I'm trying to get at is, shouldn't rhgb have a dependency
on vte so that this doesn't happen?
It does have a dependency....as seth just explained.
you can see the dependency another way.. on a F7 system do:
rpm -e --test vte
outputs to stderr:
error: Failed dependencies:
libvte.so.9 is needed by (installed) rhgb-0.17.6-1.fc7.i386
libvte.so.9 is needed by (installed) gnome-terminal-2.18.0-1.fc7.i386
there IS a dependency, there's absolutely no question about that. The
question is what's going wrong on your system that allowed rhgb to be
installed without vte. As seth suggests, you make have more missing
dependencies than you realize.
-jef
--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
