Re: verifying comps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:40:51 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> What I'm saying is that trying to include all leaf nodes in comps
> makes it even less useful (due to the extra noise) for the cases
> where it doesn't make sense.

I hear you and I'm pretty tempted to agree.  The remaining question to
solve then is: how do we make sure all the packages that should be
listed in comps actually are (and how do we check this) ...

> The other issue is graphical vs. nongraphical apps - is someone really
> going to fire up pirut (or whatever) to find sox? Or psutils?

No idea.  I know I won't (but I might have a peek using vi...).

					C

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux