On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 10:19 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 08:55:03PM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 01:32 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > > > > > [1] This isn't completely true however, since package N+1 will not > > > always depend on package N, so an intelligent mass-rebuilder could > > > skip a lot of createrepo steps by only issuing a createrepo when > > > really needed. But even if we kill say 3/4 of all createrepo > > > commands we would still spend 2 weeks in createrepo alone. > > > > That would give up one of the main advantages of the current way of > > doing things, namely that every build takes place in a minimal build > > root containing only the build requires that the package lists. > > Nobody said that package N would have to be installed, it has to be > added to the repo, though if package N+1 BuildRequires it. > > The minimality of the buildroots remains untouched in any case. Ah, right. I misread what you said, sorry. -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly