On Thursday 07 June 2007 17:18:46 Nils Philippsen wrote: > That needn't be the case. Packages could be built in a "from the ground > up" order beginning with what's by default in the buildroots (i.e. what > doesn't need to be build-required). This gets only ambiguous with cyclic > build-dependencies in which case we'd have to fall back to something > else (ls ordering, python hash ordering or even "bug the release > engineers and let them decide" ;-)). And even then, unless we introduce pauses between each build (to the order of 20~ minutes) we're not really going to make use of those rebuilt packages for later builds. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpFRdmhvAKd1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
