On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 22:11 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Wednesday 06 June 2007 12:16:06 Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >> It's not about *me*. It is about other testers. You should atleast > >> consider what I am proposing if you want more testers. > > > > I am considering better ways to handle the handoff. I'm not considering > > allowing fedora-release to stomp on locally configured repo files. > > Note that we aren't talking about custom repositories or anything like > that. User switches on fedora-devel repo and runs yum update. Just > before a new release a new fedora-release gets pushed that turns off the > devel repo and points to the stable branch. > > The rule about not changing user configuration is all about preventing > surprises to end users. I would argue that not doing what I just > described is much more surprising to many testers. And I would argue that it doesn't matter because both sides are speculation. We should look at ways to do this other than pissing off one group or the other. josh -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
